The vendors this desk watches, and the method: footprint is what the banks the desk advises actually run, coverage is one or two leaders per control domain, signal is a name carried for its exploitation or news weight alone. 24 vendors on the roster (13 footprint, 16 coverage, 2 signal). A quarterly re-rank proposes adds and drops from the numbers; the editor approves, rejects or lets the proposal stand, and every change is on the record below. Numbers as of Sep 9.
Pending Changes
Proposed
Add Cisco
Proposed
Add Broadcom / VMware
Proposed
Drop watchTowr
Identity
Footprint
BeyondTrust
Footprint, Coverage
CyberArk
Footprint, Coverage
Microsoft
Footprint, Coverage
Okta
Footprint
Ping Identity
Footprint
SailPoint
Footprint
Saviynt
Endpoint
Footprint, Coverage
CrowdStrike
Footprint, Coverage
Microsoft
Coverage
SentinelOne
Network and SASE
Footprint, Coverage
Zscaler
Coverage
Netskope
Coverage
Palo Alto Networks
Cloud posture
Coverage
Snyk
Signal
watchTowr
Coverage
Wiz
SecOps and SIEM
Footprint, Coverage
Google SecOps
Footprint, Coverage
Microsoft
Coverage
Darktrace
Coverage
Elastic Security
Coverage
Splunk
Data and privacy
Footprint
Databricks
Footprint, Coverage
Microsoft
Coverage
OneTrust
OT
Footprint, Coverage
Claroty
AI security
Signal
AI Security Tools
Coverage
Palo Alto Networks
Footprint Without a Control Domain
Footprint
SWIFT
Change Log
Sep 5
seed 24 vendors: 17 from Vendor Watch + saviynt, ping-identity, beyondtrust, swift, claroty, databricks from the cve-intel footprint
Every add, drop, revert and seed, with who decided: harry (approved or manual), auto (an unanswered proposal applied at expiry), script. A reject after an auto-apply reverts and is recorded as a revert. Source: data/vendor-roster-history.json.
The rows on this page are drawn from the sources named in the footer and may be reused with attribution to The Wang Report and to that source; the curation, the series and the annotations are The Wang Report's own. Data on this site. Named parties have a right of reply.